JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 30, 2025

A- de 2025

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar

✓Claimant Fabio Arias Giraldo·Respondent --

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad En Proceso De Constitucionalidad
  • Requisitos formales y materiales
  • Rechazar por incumplimiento de carga argumentativa
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitudes de nulidad formuladas dentro del Expediente D-15989.

El argumento principal de las diferentes peticiones, básicamente, fue que no se tramitó o resolvió oportunamente el impedimento manifestado por la doctora Diana Fajardo Rivera, con lo cual se violó el derecho al debido proceso.

La Sala Plena de la Corporación concluyó que las nulidades invocadas incumplieron el requisito de carga argumentativa y, por eso, procedió a RECHAZARLAS.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por ausencia de carga argumentativa las solicitudes de nulidad presentadas por Fabio Arias Giraldo, en representación de la Central Unitaria de los Trabajadores, CUT, y Elson Rafael Rodríguez Beltrán, dentro del expediente D-15.989.
  2. SEGUNDO. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.